Machine background would have the same statistical pattern on both the individual cuts and between diamonds. The background does not know that the different cuts came from the same diamond. The only reason that they would be equivalent only on faces from the same diamond is if they are really measuring C Is there a particular section of their article to which you are referring?
Evolution's Radiometric Dating Methods: Are they accurate? - Christian Evidence
This is a slightly modified version of an article that first appeared on the American Scientific Affiliation's website. An early draft was responded to by Dr. John Baumgardner. The current article contains Dr. Bertsche's reply. Kevin R. The RATE team claims the results have yielded convincing and irrefutable scientific evidence of a young earth.
Evolution's Radiometric Dating Methods: Are they accurate?
Several tests were done by the University of Georgia using accelerator mass spectrometry. The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50, years. Each of the two thousand meeting participants was given a disc which included the abstract of the carbon dating report. However, the abstract of the Miller presentation was removed from the website for the conference.
Can carbon 14 dating of diamonds prove a young Earth? Your articles on radiometric dating assumptions have been extremely helpful in educating me on this. I mentioned diamonds having detectable C14 as well as coal —I think I got that from creation. An evolutionist said you can easily find diamonds that have no C14, which is then evidence against a year old earth.